{"id":2210,"date":"2018-12-24T04:23:47","date_gmt":"2018-12-24T04:23:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/?p=2210"},"modified":"2018-12-24T04:23:47","modified_gmt":"2018-12-24T04:23:47","slug":"special-dossier-on-roma-broken-memory-voice-and-visual-storytelling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/2018\/12\/24\/special-dossier-on-roma-broken-memory-voice-and-visual-storytelling\/","title":{"rendered":"Special Dossier on Roma: Broken Memory, Voice and Visual Storytelling."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>*by Pedro \u00c1ngel Palou<\/p>\n<p>It is a tough task for a critic to define a masterpiece, or to grant the stature of classic to a work of art: taste, the privileges of gaze and other sociological factors all play a role. <em>Roma<\/em> is indeed a significant work, one that defines new possibilities for Mexican cinema. Cuar\u00f3n did something similar for the romantic comedy in Mexico with <em>S\u00f3lo con tu pareja <\/em>(1991) and for social satire and coming of age narratives in his depiction of the middle class in neoliberal Mexico in <em>Y tu mam\u00e1 tambi\u00e9n <\/em>(2001). After <em>Gravity,<\/em> he could have rested on his laurels and continued working in Hollywood, but instead he decided to take a risk: choosing to make a film in black and white, in Spanish and Mixtec and produced by streaming giant Netflix. Yet, a supreme artist like Cuar\u00f3n still chose to reinvent himself by continuing with his longtime obsessions.<\/p>\n<p><em>Roma<\/em> is mainly shot using long takes with lots of panning and lateral tracking shots. It is an intentionally slow movie, reflecting in some way the inevitable fragmentation of remembered lives (those of Libo \u2013 Cuar\u00f3n\u2019s real life nana \u2013 and of the director himself). For one, the image of the father is shown through a series of partial views (a hand, a cigarette, a huge car that, like him, does not fit in the house). Cuar\u00f3n is obsessive about detail not because he is channeling many of the tenets of Italian neorealism but because memory is partial and baroque, full of objects, like a crowded room.<\/p>\n<p>Critics have been harsh about <em>Roma<\/em> because they misread the film. A piece in <em>The New Yorker<\/em> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/culture\/the-front-row\/theres-a-voice-missing-in-alfonso-cuarons-roma\">Richard Brody<\/a><u>,<\/u> who is tellingly a big fan of Clint Eastwood\u2019s latest film <em>The Mule <\/em>(2018), seriously misrepresents <em>Roma<\/em> and its actors. Everything that Brody thinks is missing in <em>Roma<\/em> (most notably Cleo\u2019s voice) is actually present in the film and only those unfamiliar with Mexican social and racial history would not perceive this. <em>Roma <\/em>is a subtle critique of classism, race and the role of women in Mexico. And it\u2019s because of its subtlety that <em>Roma<\/em> offers a more powerful take on these themes. The end of the film, in this regard, redirects the narrative of the film. The climax\u2019s displacement of Cleo (who, the film makes clear can save Sofia\u2019s children, but who could not save her own child), despite the family\u2019s <em>love<\/em> for her, makes the viewer feel intensely uncomfortable. The film doesn\u2019t let the viewer escape these feelings, indeed the complex level of symbolic imagery that Cuar\u00f3n has been using throughout the film is precisely designed to highlight Cleo\u2019s simultaneous subordination and elevation and consequently her position inside and outside the family.<\/p>\n<p>But the most important question in regards to <em>Roma<\/em>, is the question of voice. In film -unlike the novel- voice can be left to dialogue or as in <em>Y tu mam\u00e1 tambi\u00e9n<\/em> to a sometimes-disturbing middle-class voiceover that interrupts the flow of actions. In <em>Roma <\/em>however, Cuar\u00f3n takes a different approach to create a voice through framing and point of view. Everything in the movie is seen through Cleo\u2019s eyes, not those of the family, not even those of Pepe -Cuaron\u00b4s <em>alter ego<\/em>-, and it is her gaze that makes <em>Roma <\/em>so compelling. In at least two moments of the film, the hospital when she is delivering her baby and in the climatic scene on the beach, the drama of that gaze is seen in all its dimension.<\/p>\n<p>Cuar\u00f3n does not hesitate to quote himself, sometimes with humor and other times with intense seriousness about the possibilities of visual narration. He is a superb storyteller. He quotes his movies -even <em>Gravity<\/em>&#8211; but also some of the Mexican movies that he regards as important: <em>Redes<\/em> (Fred Zinneman, Emilio G\u00f3mez Muriel, Paul Strand 1934) in the shots of the waves on the beach and <em>All\u00e1 en el Rancho Grande<\/em> (Fernando de Fuentes, 1936) in the scene in the basement of the hacienda when Cleo breaks her <em>pocillo<\/em> with pulque, foreshadowing the tragedy of the movie<em>.<\/em> <em>Roma <\/em>is a movie that needs to be seen many times in order to read each scene completely apart from the main narrative or the story that Cuar\u00f3n tells.<\/p>\n<p>After <em>Gravity<\/em>, audiences likely expected <em>Roma<\/em> to be an easier film, something more straightforward. A good deal of the film\u2019s publicity and press stories about the screening of the film -particularly the difficulties with Mexican exhibitors [editor comment, see Paul Julian Smith\u2019s piece in this <em>Roma<\/em> dossier]- made those expectations even more widespread. For some of us who saw the movie early on, before the buzz, this publicity didn\u2019t get in the way of interpreting the film. I read, for example, a lot of comments on how <em>pretentious<\/em> the movie is. Again, people want <em>Roma<\/em> to be something different than the film Cuar\u00f3n has made. As Mexican film audiences we should be grateful that an art cinema film like <em>Roma<\/em> can have the broad distribution that Netflix will allow it. I certainly hope <em>Roma<\/em> will open doors for other art cinema films that are being made in Mexico now.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, we have Netflix to watch the movie again and again and to read it and interpret it fairly. In the meanwhile, I am grateful that we have Roma, a groundbreaking accomplishment that creates new ways of visualizing memory.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Pedro \u00c1ngel Palou is a Mexican writer and scholar. He is currently the chair of Romance Studies at Tufts University. His latest book is <em><a href=\"http:\/\/minnesota.universitypressscholarship.com\/view\/10.5749\/minnesota\/9780816656363.001.0001\/upso-9780816656363\">Mestizo Failure(s): Race, Film and Literature in Twentieth Century Mexico<\/a> <\/em>(Boston ArtLab) and also his novel <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.planetadelibros.com.mx\/libro-todos-los-miedos\/198294\">Todos Los miedos<\/a><\/em> (Planeta)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>*by Pedro \u00c1ngel Palou It is a tough task for a critic to define a masterpiece, or to grant the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":2212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[257,251,273],"class_list":["post-2210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-film","tag-alfonso-cuaron","tag-roma","tag-voice"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/files\/2018\/12\/Roma-pepe-y-Cleo.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p49QSj-zE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2210"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2213,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2210\/revisions\/2213"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reframe.sussex.ac.uk\/mediatico\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}